How Long Does A Plum Cake Last?

start

William of Norwich
28th November 2010

Maximilian Krah and Menzingen:
A serious cause for concern?

The timeline:

January 2009

A lawyer named Maximilian Krah became public with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. associated.

20th January 2009

Father Franz Schmidberger, District Superior of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. in Germany, published a press release, which said in part: "We have the interview that Bishop Williamson granted to Swedish television has not seen. As soon as we have seen it, we will examine it carefully and lawyers for help. "

was, however, the lawyer would have to contact Menzingen may have already been determined. He was none other than the lawyer Maximilian Krah, in Dresden, along with Cornelius J. Fetsch and Daniel Adler leads a law firm.

URL: Fetsch Legal
http://www.dasoertliche.de/Themen/Wirtschaftsrecht/Dresden.html

19. January 2009

One day before Father Schmidberger's press release Maximilian Krah became a delegate to the Governing Board and the Manager of the company Dello Sarto appointed AG. The chairman of this company is Bishop Bernard Fellay, with the other members of the Board is the Father Niklaus Pfluger and First Assistant to the Treasurer of the Fraternity of St. Pius X, Father Emeric Baudot.

According to its statutes, the company pursues its objectives:

"advice on financial matters as well as care and management of assets of domestic and foreign individuals, corporations, foundations and other bodies, especially of natural and legal persons, which the Catholic moral, religious and moral teaching in its traditional sense of obligation and see, as well as handling all types of projects, particularly construction projects for the mentioned persons, as well as advising on the implementation of these projects, full purpose prescription according to statutes. "

In other words, Dello Sarto apparently AG is an investment company, presumably with the assets of the Fraternity Piux X. speculation on financial and other markets to financial gains for various projects of the Brotherhood to make. But it is possible to actively today on financial markets are to operate without usury or to risk it at least?

The company was on 13 January 2009 registered commercially and brought out 100 shares of 1,000 Swiss francs, with which they came to an initial capital of 100,000 Swiss francs.

As far as access to finances, so are the sole Maximilian Krah and Bishop Fellay authorized to make individual payments, and require Pfluger and Baudot this a common signature. Krah is not a priest, they carry out more financial power as the First Assistant or the Treasurer. Strange!

URL: Dello Sarto AG:
http://www.moneyhouse.ch/u/v/dello_sarto_ag_CH-170.3.033.031-9.htm
( http://translate.google.com/translate?tl=en&u=http://www.moneyhouse.ch/u/v/dello_sarto_ag_CH-170.3.033.031-9.htm )

Maximilian Krah including the Board of Directors of other associations, the assets of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. . Check

In the September issue of published by EMBA publication you read, the EMBA-Global program was "for the benefit of experienced managers, professionals and executives," designed to be anxious, "Fertgkeiten, knowledge and networks developed, to prevent them worldwide as a successful contribute to global players "; It also establish "an elite international network of highly qualified business people."

URL: EMBA-Global
http://www.emba-global.com/EMBA-Global_Class_Directory_WEB_FINAL_September_2010.pdf

On page 6 of the publication is from September 2010 Maximilian Krah photographed with the following liner notes:

"Maximilian Krah. German. Lawyer. Jaidhof Privatstiftung, Vienna, Austria. Lawyer with significant international experience. Currently a member of the Board of an Austrian foundation. Responsible for the management of assets of the founding capital and to the development of non-profit projects worldwide that are funded through the use of acquired assets. "

The full name of the above-mentioned company is" Jaidhof Foundation St. Joseph and Marcellus. Jaidhof is the seat of the Austrian headquarters of the Fraternity of St. Pius X.

The fact that the Society is apparently active in financial markets will cause concern to many of their followers because they believe with good reason, such an activity was risky, both financially and morally questionable. Of course it may also be among the followers of the Brotherhood men , Which give not share these fears and argue that this practice is perfectly acceptable in today's world and ultimately pursue a "good cause". Is this considered the facts?

The traditionalist infantry heard all over the world the name Krah for the first time in connection with what care to give the media the system, "Williamson Affair." His comments about the bishop, were anything but flattering, testified to a pronounced liberal ideology and poured more fuel on the fire in the global campaign against Bishop Williamson and the SSPX. This campaign had already been planned long before the Interview and the "subsequent controversy" were staged. It remains unclear to this day, however, the persons and institutions behind this carefully orchestrated campaign focused. Perhaps additional information will be accessible and throw more light on these disturbing events?

is no doubt but that Bishop Fellays has changed attitudes to Bishop Williamson dramatically. Also, people who go through with Bishop Fellay thick and thin, have noticed the change. Bishop Fellay has never hidden from this and his opposition to Bishop Williamson downright intrusive on show, which for the latter both insulting and humiliating was. It took place in the media system has resonance, to the astonishment of traditionalists in various countries, in Germany, the notorious communist [Note translator: left-wing], rabidly anti-Catholic news magazine "Der Spiegel" made her voice. Here we learned of shocking statements Fellays, Bishop Williamson as "unexploded bomb", "dangerous lump of uranium" was the title, etc. and made the defamatory imputation that he was mentally disturbed or suffering from Parkinson's disease. It should be recalled that the question is not whether one agrees with Williamson or not, or whether he or Fellay like it or not, but whether a person has a right to express in a purely historical question, a personal opinion. The ambush, in which the Swedish interviewer Ali Fergan - some Swedes, according to a Turkish-born Jew - had lured Williamson, was the only two possibilities: Either he was silent, and provided the media by his silence the evidence that he represented real revisionist ideas, or He retired with a lie from the affair. Williamson made his choice. Whether we approve this or not is not the point.

Nearly two decades earlier had occasion Williamson a private meeting of Catholics "controversial comments" on the same subject given. A journalist, however, got wind of the situation and made it public. Significance of this episode was that the response of Archbishop Lefebvre sharply contrasted by the Episcopal Fellays. Lefebvre ignored the "controversy" plain and simple, he met the secularists and anti-Catholic media with sovereign contempt, and the storm abated very soon. Fellay contrast, the media played into the hands, violated the precept of solidarity with his fellow bishop (something, what are Lefebvre had warned at the ordinations of 1988 explicitly) and was thus out of a molehill a mountain.

Krah enters the scene

Krah was given the task of finding an attorney for Williamson. His choice fell on Matthias Loßmann, which seems so very strange because Loßmann a member of the extremist Greens party, which is known in Germany as a watermelon party outdoor green, red inside. This party is pro-feminist, approves of homosexuality, abortion is good and Daniel is one of Cohn-Bendit, a member of the European Parliament, its members, a man who not only due to its leading role in the French student uprisings of 1968, but also because of his pedophile tendencies - Has come to dubious fame - which he makes no secret of his autobiography. What devil may have ridden Krah, when he chose such a lawyer for the defense of a Catholic bishop? Loßmann was really the only lawyer in Germany who was prepared to take on this case?

Krah's choice is still strange for a second reason. He is not bound by party politics, is by no means the Greens party, but Dresdner section of the liberal-led CDU, Angela Merkel, which also provides for abortion and homosexuality. Chancellor Merkel is from the former East Germany and is considered by many "Stasi-Merkel ', and since then Documents and photo evidence came to light that she - like many other young people who wanted to make a career in the GDR - was recruited by the Stasi and was formed. The same Mrs Merkel, Benedict XVI. publicly reprimanded for it, that he has abolished the so-called "excommunication" of the "Holocaust denier" Williamson, and asked the Pope to annul that decision.

In a CDU publication in May 2006, Krah shown on page 3:

URL: Dresdner Union, May 2006
http://www.cdu-dresden.de/index.php?mo mc_vjjrz_etk.pdf = & id =% 7B76658c61352fc5ab6a0940107b868a48% 7D

He describes himself in this newspaper as Christians, without further detail to make his confession. By supporters of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. we know that he visited the chapel of the Brotherhood in Dresden, nevertheless, he could have chosen a more unsuitable Teren attorney for Williamson. After

had "Der Spiegel" fired his first broadside against Williamson, Krah was looking at once the British headquarters of the Fraternity in London to persuade Williams to a second interview with the infamous magazine. Williamson rejected this suggestion, although Krah with the express approval of Bishop Fellays monitoring be moved away from the mirror-journalist was. How in the world could imagine Fellay, Williamson, or the Brotherhood could be drawn through a second interview with the mirror from the affair?

The Krah's behavior and Williamson Loßmanns the first trial was extremely embarrassing. Neither of the two tried in the least to defend the bishop, although this was despite the claims of the media is obviously breaking German law. According to non-Catholic observers, the process was what gave the two men, the parody of a defense. Krah looked slick and oily and not stingy with derisive remarks about the bishop, made a Loßmann weak, vacillating and colorless appearance. Both confessed guilt and Williamson were content to argue for "leniency". With not a single word they were received to the costs of the procedure legal problems not directly related to the "Holocaust" or whether this has happened or not, are interdependent, but only with whether Williamson had actually violated German law. They "defend" their client that is about as convincing as the high priest Caiaphas, Jesus used to "defend" ... has

In these circumstances it was no surprise to anyone that Williamson Appeal against the verdict and lodged an independent lawyer hired who was willing to bring the legal problems of the process of language. How the media reported that Bishop Fellay Williamson has given the order to fire either this law or to take his expulsion from the Fraternity in purchasing. This is extremely disconcerting, not to say scandalous, because these situations require the knowledge of all we are talking about facts, careful thought and wisdom. The press release revealed that Bishop Fellay had nothing of all this and once more contented himself with his - never substantiated - hostility to public Williamson to express. Significantly, the new lawyer was in the communique as "neo-Nazis" associated with. Thus, the NPD was meant, a party that has existed for 50 years and is active in several German state legislatures was and is. If it were a "neo-Nazi" party, it would have been prohibited in accordance with the German Constitution long ago, a fate that has already happened to many groups. In contrast to the communique, the British newspaper the Daily Telegraph so contented, the lawyer described as a representative of the "extreme right", the well-known anti-Semitic newspapers The Jerusalem Post and Haaretz did the same.

Krah was involved in the formulation of this communique? We do not know exactly, but we have irrefutable information that Maximilian Krah is a Jew. As he describes himself as "Christians" (without specifying which church he belongs to), but below source paints a very different picture of him. He took part namely in September 2010 in New York at an event, were collected from the donations for Zionist interests.

URL : American Friends of Tel Aviv University
http://www.aftau.org/site/PageServer?pagename=recentevents_Sept2010_AlumniAuction

Participants in this event are former students of the University of Tel Aviv. They collect donations for Diaspora Jews to make a trip to Israel and study at the University of Tel Aviv. Just look at the photographs. Each person to be named, and each is clearly of Jewish origin, not excluding Krah.

This does not Krah course because of the finances of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. a say. Neither his statements nor his actions, he has proven to Bishop Williamson is the slightest help, and it is quite possible that he is driving behind the scenes, all sorts of things that have not yet come to light.


enter

Since Krah the stage has
were the traditionalists witness the following events:

1) on the local websites of the Brotherhood disappeared overnight important theological articles on Judaism and the key role that our "older brothers" ( Bishop Fellay as they called it) in finance, have played Freemasonry and Communism. If we take the best Catholic tradition as a guide, so none of these items will be dismissed as "anti-Semitic."

2) Bishop Williamson was continually vilified publicly humiliated and grossly insulted.

3) The left-leaning news magazine Der Spiegel was supplied with carefully arranged interviews and stories about the "Williamson affair" to keep on cooking and so contribute to the exclusion of the bishop.

4) appeared in The Angelus, a scandalous, bursting of errors article in which the faithful were told a certain Talmudic rabbis had been a saint, in preparing the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ and the conversion of Paul a important role played.


threw in their entirety, these events inevitably to a series of questions. These questions can only To answer who is in a position to know all the facts. This is true in this case to Bishop Fellay, Superior General, but as he has full access to all aspects of the work of the Fraternity, quite apart from the fact that he has drawn Mr. Krah evident both in financial as well as in legal matters to the Council.


The author of this text contains all the accusations or insinuations to the address Bishop Fellays. He says this only to answer the following questions related to dispel the doubts and fears, which spread since the events of last Christmas, clergy and faithful, and with to alleviate the balm of truth.

Reverend,

1) Did you know that Maximilian Krah, currently a significant influence on the internal activities of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. exercises, the Jewish faith was when they offered him their trust?
2) Who Krah Maximilian, in his capacity as an attorney with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. brought into contact him or her recommend?
3) If you do not knew about Krah's background and his political connections, why was not it checked carefully before they gave him access to the inner circle of the Fraternity and inaugurated in their internal activities?
4) Why has Krah, who is not a spiritual member of the Fraternity and not to their long-time supporters heard the unique power to determine the assets of the Brotherhood?
5) Who are the shareholders of Dello Sarto AG? Are they consistently spiritual members of the Fraternity of these related religious communities? If the shares available for purchase? As the shares of the death, resignation, or resignation of a shareholder to be distributed? Who wears in each case, the power to sell such shares or otherwise to dispose of them? You? The Treasurer? The manager? The members of the Board? The General?
6) deals Why is the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. with financial activities that in modern society and even gang may be commonplace, however, hardly be reconciled with the doctrine of the Church about the money, its nature, its use and its purpose, can?
7) Why was allowed Krah, hold the "Williamson affair" to the cooking by the magazine Der Spiegel interviews arranged and supplied them with stories? How could a supposed Christian Democrat as an intermediary in contacts with a disreputable left magazine work?
8) Why was it allowed Krah, your fellow bishop to impose a lawyer who belongs to the radical left-wing Party of the Greens?
9) Why was your fellow bishop expulsion from the Fraternity of St. Pius X. threatened, just because he hired a lawyer who was actually determined to refute the unfair and ridiculous charges of sedition? Enjoy the members of the community of believers for not take precedence over those from outside the faith?
10) Can you explain why it has changed your attitude to Williamson and have always made it contemptible in public, although he will never be paid back in kind?
11) What do you do to commemorate Krah matters, given its pouch, that this man dressed in an influential position of the Brotherhood, although one can not seriously claim that the Catholic tradition of lying to him sincere at heart? If you decide on this issue as quickly as in the case Williamson?

These questions are not based on malicious intent. They reflect only our deep concern about the future of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. and their leaders resist.

POST SCRIPTUM

Anyone who thinks that the author of this it was merely a question of creating unrest, it is recalled that it was he who announced the imminent betrayal of the Transalpine Redemptorists several months before his actual arrival. The publication of this information brought me a strong criticism and hateful slanders, but after a short time it turned out that I was right. Since then I have not spoken publicly. Now I am doing this but because I - as in the case of the Redemptorists - had information that the good of the Catholic tradition spread as solid should be. Nothing would love more than when Bishop Fellay answer my serious questions and calm so the anxious minds of countless Catholics would.



Original: "Krah and Menzingen: A Cause for serious concern"