Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Raven Riley And Kate Playground Lesbian

Construction work

It is built in AOHM!

First, the guest house now has a water tank with solar heating. This means that, in contrast to our poor male employees and guests Mandana now hot running water. I content myself with from time to cold running water and the bucket shower (bucket on the floor, half a bottle of water for scooping). The refreshed! Construction work can be seen here:
The photo was made by Ingo Lenz.
The workers are really come every day with six or seven people and without their own cars from the city. This led to a fairly bustle before the Guest House. But now is the tank and has not received a stylish black finish.

The far greater development is our Maxi House, the planned home of the teenage youth. Christoph Lettgen came to see us with the plans and we have devoted a day of surveying the area. The first find was the parallel with the existing wall of the Red House and mark. Then take the appropriate lengths, measure, estimate, compute (I have the Pythagorean theorem can apply in practice times!) and stake out. Then then post and mark trees to be precipitated. Done! Speaking of trees to be precipitated, the loggers us to the village is fleßig at work, as you can see below the same. Soon, then, where now the trees are dug up, leveled the ground and dug a pit for the foundation. then this is then poured. But now the pictures:
Chris and I when measuring. Image by Ingo Lenz.

The area fell in front of the trees ...



... and while.


Play Undf Quicktime Mac

Affodille





... currently in full bloom.

Tamil Kavithaigal On Marriage

Trauerkranz mit duftenden Yves Pyaget

Cheats On Gpsphone On Mac

birthday

would actually at this point to report yet from the actors Giovanni Arvaneh and Andrea-Kathrin Loewig that the children's village visited in January, but it you are naturally through the Arts Revue informed. So this would be nothing more to say further worked, except that these two supporters of our project with a photographer to visit often in order to get a picture of the one AOHM, on the other to promote but also with their prominence in our children's village.

followed a few days later then, however, a major event, we will probably long be remembered. And not just because of the already decadent specified shall buffets.
Within a week I feirte my 20th and Mandana her 21st birthday, on the following Saturday because of all known volunteers and locals were after Kihesa in our volunteer weekend house loaded. We were about 30 people. We see here how you can put a lot effort in the preparation, our pantry was almost impossible to enter:


But the crowning of preparation was undoubtedly the übtertriebene buffet. I do not know if we expected 50 people, or were just so much fun in the kitchen, but we cooked all day Saturday only. And I mean that literally. I got up and was, above all others who put on pasta and peas to the pasta salad. At this point, once again many thanks to Michael, Pascal and Laura for their support!

The result of our cooking marathons to admire here:

The menu plan: Pasta salad, rice salad, green salad, tzatziki, herb cheese, piri-piri sauce, curry sauce, guacamole, salad plate, garlic butter, coleslaw, yoghurt sauce, light and dark bread, rolls, banana-coconut cake, fruit, German sweets (thanks to Marlies for Schokobons) and chocolate cake (my gift to Mandana).

So, we have a tidy house, beer and soda (soft drinks), tons of food. Missing only guests and music! Here are some impressions of the party.




followed was even made the VIP Club unsafe. For the approximately 15 people who drove there no longer than 2 taxis were needed. I love the Tanzanian road.
The next morning ...


Mobile Broadband Dongle, Can It Get Hacked Into?

New

Sooooooo ... what's new?

Actually a lot. First of all please now runs immediately next to the kiosk and buys the "free time . Revue "In the current issue is a report on the visit of two actors in our home (and I believe in a photograph my right leg to see, I'll famous)

be otherwise, the following blog-posts the content! . Mandanas and my legendary birthday party, cute kittens, works, and of course our children so much fun reading

Your Heiner

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Chelsea Charms On Webcam In 2010

Introduction

Dear friends of truth!

The "Krahgate" is the revelation about the Zionist Maximilian Krah, which since 2005 consultant and advocate of the Roman Catholic Society of St. Pius X. The Krahgate was from "William of Norwich" revealed as well as "Veritas1961" fanned out (see references below) and shows that Krah serves the interests of anti-Christian Judaism. The real
hl. William Norwich is the one martyr, on 22 March 1144 in England was the victim of a Jewish ritual murder. Comparable with the late Anderl of Rinn in Tyrol and many others.

Since his appearance in the Fraternity is systematically Krah its Judaization. This helps him to his mentor and confidant Father Niklaus Pfluger with relevant, but also his business partner and Bishop Bernard Fellay, Father Franz Schmidberger.
The deformation of the church by the Second Vatican Council in the "conciliar church" is now repeated in the small in the Fraternity.


Catholic following web sites provide an investigation of the case:

Ignis Ardens, England


Cathinfo, USA

Französisch
 - Les Dessous de l'Affaire Williamson (04/12/2010)

And a telling image
friends - Krah midst of the "Alumni of the University of Tel Aviv " (09/27/2010)

Once more languages become available, we make these public.



It is the battle for the Society. On the one hand, try the truth-loving Bishop Richard Williamson and allied faithfulness, the Brotherhood of the Catholic line, the estimated founder Archbishop keep Marcel Lefebvre.
On the other side trying Krah and his assistants, the Brotherhood to Judaism and thus subject to the anti-Christianity. The situation is very serious, but is entirely in God's hands. Therefore we pray for Bishop Williamson and his allies and faithful.

with Judaism, the unfaithful Judaism is meant that, with God's Mosaic Jews and their Old Testament - absorbed the full in the donated on Golgotha new and eternal covenant - has broken, embittered since 2000 been fighting against our Lord Jesus Christ and the satanic Talmud has invented. The Holy Church of Christ is the true Israel! Let us leave

Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre the final word:
"Since Israel has rejected the true Messiah, it invented for another, this-worldly and earthly messianism: the domination of the world by money, by the Freemasons, by the Revolution, by socialist democracy.
However we must not forget that there were Jews, followers of the true Messiah, the true Israel, founded a spiritual kingdom, which prepared the heavenly kingdom.
The world domination plans of the Jews in our time really since the founding of Freemasonry and the Revolution, the beheading of the church and introduced the world socialist democracy. "
(Marcel Lefebvre: Die Biographie“ von Bischof Tissier de Mallerais, Sarto 2008, Seite 639)

Auf Englisch:
„Since Israel refused the true Messiah, it would give itself another messianism that is temporal and earthbound, dominating the world by money, Freemasonry, Revolution, and social democracy.
We must not, however, forget that those Jews who were disciples of the true Messiah founded the true Israel, the spiritual kingdom, which prepares the heavenly kingdom.
The worldwide designs of the Jews are being brought about in our time, but they started with the foundation of Masonry and the Revolution which has decapitated the Church and set up worldwide socialist democracy.“
("Marcel Lefebvre" by Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, Angelus Press, Pages 602-603)

for goodness sake!

Friday, February 11, 2011

How To Make Hidden Blade

Ligurische Mimosen


... on its way to us, three times a week.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Korean Male Model And Bmi

Small photo gallery

weekend action near the beginning of the voluntary service: the nearby hills by storm:


Then a couple of tents. We went on holiday with the folks back home to "Camp Site River Side" in Iringa. On behalf of our local Boy Scout troop thanks again for the great Igloo tent!

All luggage and a slightly moody Baraka.

Doto (left) had his jumper present. I help out but you!

While some are still struggling with the intricacies of the igloo tent and equipment ..

... Our tent is already in full bloom.

Mary and Nuraf are schonmal sample.

And Mama Meshak refuted the rumor that all Africans were afraid of dogs.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

How Long Does A Plum Cake Last?

start

William of Norwich
28th November 2010


Maximilian Krah and Menzingen:
A serious cause for concern?

The timeline:

January 2009

A lawyer named Maximilian Krah became public with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. associated.

20th January 2009

Father Franz Schmidberger, District Superior of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. in Germany, published a press release, which said in part: "We have the interview that Bishop Williamson granted to Swedish television has not seen. As soon as we have seen it, we will examine it carefully and lawyers for help. "

was, however, the lawyer would have to contact Menzingen may have already been determined. He was none other than the lawyer Maximilian Krah, in Dresden, along with Cornelius J. Fetsch and Daniel Adler leads a law firm.

URL: Fetsch Legal
http://www.dasoertliche.de/Themen/Wirtschaftsrecht/Dresden.html

19. January 2009

One day before Father Schmidberger's press release Maximilian Krah became a delegate to the Governing Board and the Manager of the company Dello Sarto appointed AG. The chairman of this company is Bishop Bernard Fellay, with the other members of the Board is the Father Niklaus Pfluger and First Assistant to the Treasurer of the Fraternity of St. Pius X, Father Emeric Baudot.

According to its statutes, the company pursues its objectives:
"advice on financial matters as well as care and management of assets of domestic and foreign individuals, corporations, foundations and other bodies, especially of natural and legal persons, which the Catholic moral, religious and moral teaching in its traditional sense of obligation and see, as well as handling all types of projects, particularly construction projects for the mentioned persons, as well as advising on the implementation of these projects, full purpose prescription according to statutes. "

In other words, Dello Sarto apparently AG is an investment company, presumably with the assets of the Fraternity Piux X. speculation on financial and other markets to financial gains for various projects of the Brotherhood to make. But it is possible to actively today on financial markets are to operate without usury or to risk it at least?

The company was on 13 January 2009 registered commercially and brought out 100 shares of 1,000 Swiss francs, with which they came to an initial capital of 100,000 Swiss francs.

As far as access to finances, so are the sole Maximilian Krah and Bishop Fellay authorized to make individual payments, and require Pfluger and Baudot this a common signature. Krah is not a priest, they carry out more financial power as the First Assistant or the Treasurer. Strange!

URL: Dello Sarto AG:
http://www.moneyhouse.ch/u/v/dello_sarto_ag_CH-170.3.033.031-9.htm
( http://translate.google.com/translate?tl=en&u=http://www.moneyhouse.ch/u/v/dello_sarto_ag_CH-170.3.033.031-9.htm )

Maximilian Krah including the Board of Directors of other associations, the assets of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. . Check

In the September issue of published by EMBA publication you read, the EMBA-Global program was "for the benefit of experienced managers, professionals and executives," designed to be anxious, "Fertgkeiten, knowledge and networks developed, to prevent them worldwide as a successful contribute to global players "; It also establish "an elite international network of highly qualified business people."

URL: EMBA-Global
http://www.emba-global.com/EMBA-Global_Class_Directory_WEB_FINAL_September_2010.pdf

On page 6 of the publication is from September 2010 Maximilian Krah photographed with the following liner notes:
"Maximilian Krah. German. Lawyer. Jaidhof Privatstiftung, Vienna, Austria. Lawyer with significant international experience. Currently a member of the Board of an Austrian foundation. Responsible for the management of assets of the founding capital and to the development of non-profit projects worldwide that are funded through the use of acquired assets. "

The full name of the above-mentioned company is" Jaidhof Foundation St. Joseph and Marcellus. Jaidhof is the seat of the Austrian headquarters of the Fraternity of St. Pius X.

The fact that the Society is apparently active in financial markets will cause concern to many of their followers because they believe with good reason, such an activity was risky, both financially and morally questionable. Of course it may also be among the followers of the Brotherhood men , Which give not share these fears and argue that this practice is perfectly acceptable in today's world and ultimately pursue a "good cause". Is this considered the facts?

The traditionalist infantry heard all over the world the name Krah for the first time in connection with what care to give the media the system, "Williamson Affair." His comments about the bishop, were anything but flattering, testified to a pronounced liberal ideology and poured more fuel on the fire in the global campaign against Bishop Williamson and the SSPX. This campaign had already been planned long before the Interview and the "subsequent controversy" were staged. It remains unclear to this day, however, the persons and institutions behind this carefully orchestrated campaign focused. Perhaps additional information will be accessible and throw more light on these disturbing events?

is no doubt but that Bishop Fellays has changed attitudes to Bishop Williamson dramatically. Also, people who go through with Bishop Fellay thick and thin, have noticed the change. Bishop Fellay has never hidden from this and his opposition to Bishop Williamson downright intrusive on show, which for the latter both insulting and humiliating was. It took place in the media system has resonance, to the astonishment of traditionalists in various countries, in Germany, the notorious communist [Note translator: left-wing], rabidly anti-Catholic news magazine "Der Spiegel" made her voice. Here we learned of shocking statements Fellays, Bishop Williamson as "unexploded bomb", "dangerous lump of uranium" was the title, etc. and made the defamatory imputation that he was mentally disturbed or suffering from Parkinson's disease. It should be recalled that the question is not whether one agrees with Williamson or not, or whether he or Fellay like it or not, but whether a person has a right to express in a purely historical question, a personal opinion. The ambush, in which the Swedish interviewer Ali Fergan - some Swedes, according to a Turkish-born Jew - had lured Williamson, was the only two possibilities: Either he was silent, and provided the media by his silence the evidence that he represented real revisionist ideas, or He retired with a lie from the affair. Williamson made his choice. Whether we approve this or not is not the point.

Nearly two decades earlier had occasion Williamson a private meeting of Catholics "controversial comments" on the same subject given. A journalist, however, got wind of the situation and made it public. Significance of this episode was that the response of Archbishop Lefebvre sharply contrasted by the Episcopal Fellays. Lefebvre ignored the "controversy" plain and simple, he met the secularists and anti-Catholic media with sovereign contempt, and the storm abated very soon. Fellay contrast, the media played into the hands, violated the precept of solidarity with his fellow bishop (something, what are Lefebvre had warned at the ordinations of 1988 explicitly) and was thus out of a molehill a mountain.


Krah enters the scene

Krah was given the task of finding an attorney for Williamson. His choice fell on Matthias Loßmann, which seems so very strange because Loßmann a member of the extremist Greens party, which is known in Germany as a watermelon party outdoor green, red inside. This party is pro-feminist, approves of homosexuality, abortion is good and Daniel is one of Cohn-Bendit, a member of the European Parliament, its members, a man who not only due to its leading role in the French student uprisings of 1968, but also because of his pedophile tendencies - Has come to dubious fame - which he makes no secret of his autobiography. What devil may have ridden Krah, when he chose such a lawyer for the defense of a Catholic bishop? Loßmann was really the only lawyer in Germany who was prepared to take on this case?

Krah's choice is still strange for a second reason. He is not bound by party politics, is by no means the Greens party, but Dresdner section of the liberal-led CDU, Angela Merkel, which also provides for abortion and homosexuality. Chancellor Merkel is from the former East Germany and is considered by many "Stasi-Merkel ', and since then Documents and photo evidence came to light that she - like many other young people who wanted to make a career in the GDR - was recruited by the Stasi and was formed. The same Mrs Merkel, Benedict XVI. publicly reprimanded for it, that he has abolished the so-called "excommunication" of the "Holocaust denier" Williamson, and asked the Pope to annul that decision.

In a CDU publication in May 2006, Krah shown on page 3:

URL: Dresdner Union, May 2006
http://www.cdu-dresden.de/index.php?mo mc_vjjrz_etk.pdf = & id =% 7B76658c61352fc5ab6a0940107b868a48% 7D

He describes himself in this newspaper as Christians, without further detail to make his confession. By supporters of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. we know that he visited the chapel of the Brotherhood in Dresden, nevertheless, he could have chosen a more unsuitable Teren attorney for Williamson. After

had "Der Spiegel" fired his first broadside against Williamson, Krah was looking at once the British headquarters of the Fraternity in London to persuade Williams to a second interview with the infamous magazine. Williamson rejected this suggestion, although Krah with the express approval of Bishop Fellays monitoring be moved away from the mirror-journalist was. How in the world could imagine Fellay, Williamson, or the Brotherhood could be drawn through a second interview with the mirror from the affair?

The Krah's behavior and Williamson Loßmanns the first trial was extremely embarrassing. Neither of the two tried in the least to defend the bishop, although this was despite the claims of the media is obviously breaking German law. According to non-Catholic observers, the process was what gave the two men, the parody of a defense. Krah looked slick and oily and not stingy with derisive remarks about the bishop, made a Loßmann weak, vacillating and colorless appearance. Both confessed guilt and Williamson were content to argue for "leniency". With not a single word they were received to the costs of the procedure legal problems not directly related to the "Holocaust" or whether this has happened or not, are interdependent, but only with whether Williamson had actually violated German law. They "defend" their client that is about as convincing as the high priest Caiaphas, Jesus used to "defend" ... has

In these circumstances it was no surprise to anyone that Williamson Appeal against the verdict and lodged an independent lawyer hired who was willing to bring the legal problems of the process of language. How the media reported that Bishop Fellay Williamson has given the order to fire either this law or to take his expulsion from the Fraternity in purchasing. This is extremely disconcerting, not to say scandalous, because these situations require the knowledge of all we are talking about facts, careful thought and wisdom. The press release revealed that Bishop Fellay had nothing of all this and once more contented himself with his - never substantiated - hostility to public Williamson to express. Significantly, the new lawyer was in the communique as "neo-Nazis" associated with. Thus, the NPD was meant, a party that has existed for 50 years and is active in several German state legislatures was and is. If it were a "neo-Nazi" party, it would have been prohibited in accordance with the German Constitution long ago, a fate that has already happened to many groups. In contrast to the communique, the British newspaper the Daily Telegraph so contented, the lawyer described as a representative of the "extreme right", the well-known anti-Semitic newspapers The Jerusalem Post and Haaretz did the same.

Krah was involved in the formulation of this communique? We do not know exactly, but we have irrefutable information that Maximilian Krah is a Jew. As he describes himself as "Christians" (without specifying which church he belongs to), but below source paints a very different picture of him. He took part namely in September 2010 in New York at an event, were collected from the donations for Zionist interests.

URL : American Friends of Tel Aviv University
http://www.aftau.org/site/PageServer?pagename=recentevents_Sept2010_AlumniAuction

Participants in this event are former students of the University of Tel Aviv. They collect donations for Diaspora Jews to make a trip to Israel and study at the University of Tel Aviv. Just look at the photographs. Each person to be named, and each is clearly of Jewish origin, not excluding Krah.

This does not Krah course because of the finances of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. a say. Neither his statements nor his actions, he has proven to Bishop Williamson is the slightest help, and it is quite possible that he is driving behind the scenes, all sorts of things that have not yet come to light.


enter
Since Krah the stage has
were the traditionalists witness the following events:

1) on the local websites of the Brotherhood disappeared overnight important theological articles on Judaism and the key role that our "older brothers" ( Bishop Fellay as they called it) in finance, have played Freemasonry and Communism. If we take the best Catholic tradition as a guide, so none of these items will be dismissed as "anti-Semitic."

2) Bishop Williamson was continually vilified publicly humiliated and grossly insulted.

3) The left-leaning news magazine Der Spiegel was supplied with carefully arranged interviews and stories about the "Williamson affair" to keep on cooking and so contribute to the exclusion of the bishop.

4) appeared in The Angelus, a scandalous, bursting of errors article in which the faithful were told a certain Talmudic rabbis had been a saint, in preparing the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ and the conversion of Paul a important role played.


threw in their entirety, these events inevitably to a series of questions. These questions can only To answer who is in a position to know all the facts. This is true in this case to Bishop Fellay, Superior General, but as he has full access to all aspects of the work of the Fraternity, quite apart from the fact that he has drawn Mr. Krah evident both in financial as well as in legal matters to the Council.


The author of this text contains all the accusations or insinuations to the address Bishop Fellays. He says this only to answer the following questions related to dispel the doubts and fears, which spread since the events of last Christmas, clergy and faithful, and with to alleviate the balm of truth.
Reverend,

1) Did you know that Maximilian Krah, currently a significant influence on the internal activities of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. exercises, the Jewish faith was when they offered him their trust?
2) Who Krah Maximilian, in his capacity as an attorney with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. brought into contact him or her recommend?
3) If you do not knew about Krah's background and his political connections, why was not it checked carefully before they gave him access to the inner circle of the Fraternity and inaugurated in their internal activities?
4) Why has Krah, who is not a spiritual member of the Fraternity and not to their long-time supporters heard the unique power to determine the assets of the Brotherhood?
5) Who are the shareholders of Dello Sarto AG? Are they consistently spiritual members of the Fraternity of these related religious communities? If the shares available for purchase? As the shares of the death, resignation, or resignation of a shareholder to be distributed? Who wears in each case, the power to sell such shares or otherwise to dispose of them? You? The Treasurer? The manager? The members of the Board? The General?
6) deals Why is the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. with financial activities that in modern society and even gang may be commonplace, however, hardly be reconciled with the doctrine of the Church about the money, its nature, its use and its purpose, can?
7) Why was allowed Krah, hold the "Williamson affair" to the cooking by the magazine Der Spiegel interviews arranged and supplied them with stories? How could a supposed Christian Democrat as an intermediary in contacts with a disreputable left magazine work?
8) Why was it allowed Krah, your fellow bishop to impose a lawyer who belongs to the radical left-wing Party of the Greens?
9) Why was your fellow bishop expulsion from the Fraternity of St. Pius X. threatened, just because he hired a lawyer who was actually determined to refute the unfair and ridiculous charges of sedition? Enjoy the members of the community of believers for not take precedence over those from outside the faith?
10) Can you explain why it has changed your attitude to Williamson and have always made it contemptible in public, although he will never be paid back in kind?
11) What do you do to commemorate Krah matters, given its pouch, that this man dressed in an influential position of the Brotherhood, although one can not seriously claim that the Catholic tradition of lying to him sincere at heart? If you decide on this issue as quickly as in the case Williamson?

These questions are not based on malicious intent. They reflect only our deep concern about the future of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. and their leaders resist.



POST SCRIPTUM

Anyone who thinks that the author of this it was merely a question of creating unrest, it is recalled that it was he who announced the imminent betrayal of the Transalpine Redemptorists several months before his actual arrival. The publication of this information brought me a strong criticism and hateful slanders, but after a short time it turned out that I was right. Since then I have not spoken publicly. Now I am doing this but because I - as in the case of the Redemptorists - had information that the good of the Catholic tradition spread as solid should be. Nothing would love more than when Bishop Fellay answer my serious questions and calm so the anxious minds of countless Catholics would.



Original: "Krah and Menzingen: A Cause for serious concern"

Monday, January 3, 2011

Sale Agreement Motor Vehicle

timeline view

Veritas1961
4th December 2010


Timeline of events and motivations of the actors
: Krah and Menzingen

The last Saturday of William of Norwich on this subject on the Internet Asked Article has had repercussions and led to a number of new information has come to light. Some of them were in one or other Internet entry is challenged, but a significant proportion was generally accepted as irrefutable.

In the last few days I have looked at the various internet articles and comments again and am in the process come to the conclusion that the timing of events raises nagging questions. Should I be correct in this assessment, this raises serious conclusions.

undisputed is this: On Wednesday the 17th November 2010 was Matt Loßmann with the German Press Agency (DPA) was contacted and let them know he leave his position as defender of Bishop Williamson's another lawyer, whose name "Will be announced soon ... You will then see why my services are no longer needed. "

Loßmanns This statement can be a wonder. Why he thought it necessary to turn to a press agency and this share, he should do in future with the Williamson case anything more? That a member of the political super correct Green Party of the ire of the public or the gentlemen of the press has drawn up, not like you to believe it, the more so when Loßmannn during the trial from April 2010 to her ears from Williamson's views distances had. In fact, let his behavior during the process no doubt about the fact that he worked against the interests of his client. We conclude that he has leaked to the media with his message to the DPA the ball, so that once again a "controversy" could conjure up. He would say nothing and are content to simply can answer any questions off the cuff. But just that he did not - which speaks volumes about his motivation, not only at this late date, but from the beginning of the "Williamson affair" at.

is also undisputed that Williamson's new attorney, tungsten Nahrath, on Thursday the 18th November, a Communication to the new judge Birgit Kingfisher sent, namely via their personal Office Fax. In his message he stated that he was acting now on behalf of Williamson and request a postponement of the process, could be so quickly decided in principle on the issues under discussion.

Finally, it is clear that Stefan was winter of "Der Spiegel" already within half an hour by telephone with Nahrath the name, because he already knew that Williamson had chosen this as its new attorney. Who had it leaked this information? About the judge or other judicial officer? Both would be possible in principle, but rather unlikely, because not even know kingfisher secretary that Nahrath had sent this fax. If the leak started from the judge, they would have their exposure immediately and undoubtedly also risks sanctions for unethical professional conduct. If the culprit was a judicial officer, this would have put his job on the line. It may be argued, it could have played a political motivation. Again, this would be possible, but there is not a shred of evidence for it exists, we can probably rule out this option with a clear conscience.

We know that Loßmann in on the identity of the new Advocate image was. The reason that he resigned as defense consisted in the fact that he was unable or unwilling to cooperate with Nahrath. Thus there are two possibilities: either has Loßmannn even with the "mirror" set the name, or he has forwarded the information to Maximilian Krah, known as informers of the Hamburg news magazine. The first variant seems to incredible, because it would have been easy for Loßmannn, contact the "mirror" themselves and the matter hereby make public. Thus, everything points to the second variant, the more so, when there is a historical precedent.


A brief

Let us return for a moment, for the first trial of the bishop, the 16th to April 2010 had been arranged. On 4 March 2010 Williamson received a message from Father Thouvenot, who made his name in all sorts of Bishop Fellays conditions. Among other things, he gave him "a formal prohibition to appear before the court of Regensburg," and the statement that he would leave it to his lawyers (and Loßmann Krah), "the situation in your favor, and to those of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. to control to which you belong. "

Why Fellay had issued this command? The latter was based on naked fear, or had other reasons for the bishop? If one bears in mind that pretty much was the most unsuitable Loßmannn lawyer, which one would be able to think, and he pointed with no word on the fragile legal foundation of the case against Williamson, and considering further that Krah, as William of Norwich proves his intrigues against his client is targeted, (especially in light of the following events) I am convinced that close to the conclusion that Fellay would give the lawyers of his choice, free hand so that they could act without regard to any objections Williamson. Had the latter been present at the trial, so He had the machinations Krah and Loßmannns hardly tolerated, as it is the German language is powerful, he would have protested against their mendacious and absurd allegations. Also if he had even fired on the spot and taken over his own defense. This is admittedly a speculation, because firstly we can not read Bishop Fellays thoughts and know his motives, as long as he himself tells us, and secondly we do not know what Williams might have said or done.

No speculation, however, is this: A few days before trial called a mirror-journalist Loßmann. The conversation went something like this: "If Bishop Williamson appear at the trial in person? "" No. "" Why not? "Command from his superior." "A written order?" "Yes." "May I see the text?" "No." Soon after

This word Abtausch receives a call from Loßmann Krah. "Do you have the letter from Menzingen" Yes ", please can you make a copy for me," answers this question and Loßmann Krah sends the requested copy. About two hours later, the same level reporter calls once more on to Loßmann and shares with it, now he has a copy of Fellays command.

So all the indications are that Loßmann his professional obligations in turn hurt and leaked information about Williamson and Krah Nahrath added. That the "mirror" within half an hour from Nahrath appointment learned the last doubt of the complicity of Loßmann Krah and wane with the magazine.


Lie anyone here?

We know that the General House of the Brotherhood of St. Pius X priests on Saturday 20th November 2010 approximately at 9:00 Swiss time clock at the behest of Father Thouvenot Fellays a statement on its website stationed, which said among other things: "The Superior General, Bishop Bernard Fellay, has learned from the press that Bishop Williamson those charged with his defense attorney ten days has released before his trial." Ended the statement, as we all know by now, with the threat, if Williamson not by his "neo-Nazi lawyer reportedly" divisive, Fellay would exclude him from the Fraternity.

Less is generally known that Father Thouvenat - has released a second statement to Williamson - again, at the direction Fellays. He did this Sunday 21st November in the early afternoon. The text was the Bishops and District Superior of the Fraternity St. Pius X. via e-mail, he was entitled: "Clarification to Press Release of the General House" and aimed to "explain" the day before the declaration made more accurate.

was in the second section of this text it, "Bishop Williamson wanted a second lawyer to hire, who is politically well-known (" the only neo-Nazi lawyer in Germany who is not in jail .*) ... The Court of Regensburg was Wednesday the 17 . November 2010 on the dismissal of the first lawyer [Loßmann] be informed, and the identity of his successor began last week on the 19th November 2010 to leak out. "

[* Who exactly said this? And as the allusion to the fact that all are so-called "neo-Nazi" Lawyers behind bars? Why can not the Marxist, liberal and Zionist?]

That I know all about this second, far less well known statement, I owe a German-speaking spiritual friend who has sent me. Thanks Hollingsworth, we know the following, derived from Bishop Williamson text:

"I [Williamson] was represented by Nahrath. F. Bishop sent Father Angles to tell me [on Friday afternoon], that he me out of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. would exclude if I Nahrath not drop. It seems to me, my appeal process can take place only if I have either approved by Menzingen lawyer who defended me, or have a lawyer who defended me seriously, but not of Menzingen is approved. In my case, Father has emailed A. [Clock on Friday some 13] to Bishop F., but no thanks to an appeal before the German courts, and I've added ironically, it would be nice if Menzingen would pay the penalty. Bishop F. e-mailed back soon, "Deo Gratias. No problem with the payment of repentance "(Friday, 15 clock GMT, ie Greenwich Mean Time).

The redrawn here time frame within which the events have played, is confirmed by the second, less well-known statement. In gate 4 it states, "Bishop Williamson Bishop Fellay was Friday 19 November 2010 in the early afternoon also advised that he does not wish to continue the process "- in the interest of the Fraternity well understood.

Here it is to point out that Father Angles Friday morning 19 November in England arrived and ate breakfast with the bishop. The order to go to London to negotiate with Williamson, but he had only received late Thursday evening, then, was Fellay in Rome, where he led for two days in Albano talks with priests of the Italian district. Angles Williamson should persuade Nahrath to give the marching orders, and thereby forestall his expulsion from the Fraternity. Just here, however, the problem . This would mean that Fellay already Thursday the 18th November knew that Williams had decided to Nahrath - the same day ie on which his letter to Judge Nahrath Kingfisher sent and the "mirror" got wind of Nahrath appointment. In the statement of 20 November, it is clear: "The Superior General, Bishop Fellay, has made the press has ... "Here we encounter a second problem .

who clicks on the following Internet link will see what results the search engine Google.com under "Nahrath and Williamson" light promotes:

http://news.google.com/news/search?pz=1&cf cf = all & ned = & hl = en & en_ie nolr = 1 & q = & williamson Nahrath + = all & scoring = n & start = 0

On 4 December 2010 (9 clock GMT) there was this 55 results, the first of which figured on page 6 and the last one on page 1. According to a report in German Press Agency was the story first Saturday 20th November in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz published. Shortly thereafter, she was a little-known Italian online newspaper called Il Giornalettismo and then from the "mirror" projects did.

A search reveals that "Der Spiegel" in its German and his English Internet version the first time Saturday 20th reported November on the relations between Nahrath and Williamson. In other words, before this date, neither the Hamburg news magazine, nor any reported another press organization that the Bishop had chosen Nahrath to his lawyer. On the other hand, we know with certainty that Fellay Thursday 18. Angles on the evening of November spoken to this matter and the latter sent as an emissary to London, and according to the second declaration of the Fraternity began Nahrath identity "Friday morning the 19th November to leak out. "

How Bishop Fellay Thursday the 18th November learned from the press of the relations between Nahrath and Williamson, where until two days later appeared the first Üresseberichte on this subject?

There are only three possible explanations: first

Fellay had an instinctive foreboding.
second Fellay was in this case to a heavenly message given.
third Fellay was one Initiated via phone, fax or e-mail information.

is clear to me that explanation number three must apply, she is the only logical. Who could have Fellay into the picture? There are three candidates: "The Mirror", Matt Krah Loßmann or Maximilian. Who was it from the three?

The "mirror" of elimination in our opinion, because he signed on its Article 20 November Father Thouvenot cited as the source, which means a high probability of making the latter the day before, 19, has been contacted by the magazine's telephone. Seems even more unlikely in that Fellay has received the information from Loßmann. This would are Wednesday 17 November can apply directly to Fellay, chose as a partner, however, either the "mirror" or Krah. In addition, the Society had given its political orientation Loßmann hardly paid any confidence. Therefore comes as a villain in the game solely our old friend Krah in question.

The redrawn in the previous time frame means that Fellay has answered his own statements, not only learned from the press about the appointment Nahrath the defender Bishop Williamson. It also means that he was Friday 19 November an agreement with Williamson completed, at least in theory drew the line under the matter. Furthermore, it means that the declaration of the Priestly Fraternity of 20 November was deliberately misleading and that the idea that their goal consisted in the prevention of a "huge press campaign" is plain nonsense because Fellay the "mirror" people on Friday evening when she called him, had to leave that Nahrath already his post had resigned as a defender Williamson. Fellay that nothing about the earlier lost on that day made appointment with Williamson, speaks for itself, as well as the fact that he ruled out his threat, the latter from the Brotherhood, even on 20 November on their website repeated. Even more repulsive are the since Williamson's interview with Swedish television constantly repeated references to the alleged threatening situation of the Society in Germany. In its second, Sunday 21 November statement issued attacked Fellay and Thouvenot again on this flimsy trick

"The situation in Germany is still tense, and there is this new incident, a bomb strike, and threaten our apostolate directly, not to mention our profile, that is our reputation .

Such things we have heard time and again since 2009. You tell us but with your beautiful, which led by the Priestly Fraternity of schools, priories or other institutions of the German authorities have been closed! How many priests, monks, nuns and other affiliated persons of the Brotherhood have received a summons, are questioned or prosecuted for any crimes? To my knowledge not one! The whole thing is nothing more than scaremongering, which has the purpose to isolate Williamson and to curry favor with the Modernists in Rome. Who at this point do not agree with me let me disabuse them - not by repeating mere allegations by German or other members of the Fraternity, but by describing specific persecution of the German state against the latter.

still further information to the reader: Sunday 21 November 2010 stationed "The Clarification" an Internet article in which the day before she was sentenced to Fellays request Williamson justified. Although these two men their agreement already Friday the 19th November had taken a day after Williamson Fellay threatened again with the exclusion, despite the fact that the latter had already separated from his lawyer Nahrath. Fellay justified this step by saying that Williamson had not the German court informed of his decision. This is sophistry of the worst kind.

We repeat: Friday 19 November informed Angles Fellay clock by 13 GMT on Williamson's decision. The answer was Fellay GMT by 15 clock. In Switzerland and Germany, it was four clock in the afternoon. Personally I have never had to do with the German bureaucracy, but my experience elsewhere tells me that a Friday afternoon is the worst possible time, a bureaucrat who thinks only of the upcoming weekend, to ask for any more. It not really enough when Williamson, the German court on Monday over its decision to put into the picture? Obviously not. Why not? Because of the "imminent press campaign". Why, pray tell, Fellay has the press not be personal - or by Thouvenot - Informed that Nahraht had already received the marching orders? Fellay would the doctor can also call Krah, since the latter has wide-ranging contacts and therefore had the right man to Williamson and Fellays problem on Friday to rid the world? But no, this idea is already Fellay not even come!

If leave my work and my travel me the necessary time to it, I'll put in a few days ago another article on the Internet, in which concerns Krah and the "mirror". I close here by pointing to a passage from the second, lesser-known Father Thouvenot message to the bishops and district superiors. In penultimate section we read there:

"We sincerely hope that Bishop Williamson will not commit irreparable act by permitting, to be used by political groups who abuse our sacred religion for purposes that are foreign."

Of course, all priests and bishops should keep as far as possible to let the clamp of unacceptable and objectionable political goals, but the problem exists for the Zionist lobby, which now by Krah and his clique of men behind the Fraternity of St. Pius X. acts as the neo-Nazis. The big difference between the two groups is that it is the latter a tiny sect in the former and a global power.

Therefore: Let your speech be yes yes, no, no!



Original: "Time Frames and motivation, and Krah Menzingen"

Saturday, January 1, 2011

How To Avoid Shoe Creases



Veritas1961
18th December 2010


After I read by William Norwich Internet article a second time, I realized that I had a gold mine of information from me. But in gold mines you have to dig long, until you actually promotes the thick clumps of days. For this reason, this paper is quite long from, but I hope that he is the cause of truth will be beneficial. Wen

the facts that form the background to the scandal-Krah meet with concern to be recommended, the site of EMBA-Global (www.emba-global.com) to study carefully in order to get an idea like this can what it is that business school really. This describes itself as follows:
"The EMBA-Global program brings together an elite international network of high profile business people. Thanks to the world-renowned faculty as well as the unique global study program, you have exclusive access to the most advanced ideas, most ground-breaking research programs and innovative international business practices. Whether the students decide for now 'EMBA-Global Americas and Europe' or 'EMBA-Global Asia', together they will help to forge the future of global business. . Thereto is no doubt, but should be written behind the ears, that success is only the hold, thinking globally "

Under the Global Network section reads:

" EMBA-Global students typically operate at international level work of various agencies from around the world or manage teams in different locations. They represent a variety of functions, sectors and nationalities. Common to all is of course the willingness to shed outdated ideas on board and think globally. "

You write behind the ears, do that all the participants to think globally and act in this course. - In the same section states:

"After successful completion of the EMBA-Global program you become a lifelong member of an extraordinary international network of former graduates, of which there are about 75 500. From the very first study day on you will have access to this unparalleled pool of knowledge, business experience and opportunities to participate in networks. "

write one behind the ear, that EMBA-Global is not an ordinary business school, but aims at the creation of a global manager's elite, whose alumni stay after graduation in conjunction with each other, no matter in which sector of business they operate.

See "Program Details" it says:

"The core courses are taught in block form, which means that you will study in a month for several consecutive days, alternating between London and New York."

You write behind the ear, that the student in New York can come just once to his friends and watch as they collect donations for the University of Tel Aviv. How convenient - you are caught this way two birds with one stone (and perhaps additionally one or the other Palestinian, who is not among the friends of the University of Tel Aviv ...).

in the same section we learn the following:
. "Courses of EMBA-Global start in May and take 20 months"

In the section "Admission Requirements" is the following passage of particular interest:
"The caliber and diversity the EMBA-Global students are among the main strengths, which the program of study from all other 'Master of Business Administration' courses for holders of Executive positions are different. The admission procedure will guarantee that you will study alongside the brightest and the best. "

You write behind the ear, that only tough globalists are welcome, are not content with half measures!

in the same section, other criteria for inclusion in this elite are listed:
- "A successful career with several years experience in managing people, projects, budgets and other resources;
- Transnational responsibility or proof that you seek such an active;
- A global perspective . With international contacts and objectives, as well as interest in the lichens of global networks "

Under the" fees "we learn that:
" The fees for in May 2011 starting classes with be 'EMBA-Global Americas and Europe programs' 144 156 Dollars * (the equivalent of about 93,000 pounds or 110,000 €).
are included in the course fees:
education;
course materials, including most text books;
accommodation in all teaching blocks during the first three semesters;
staying with the mandatory international seminar or special order .** "

The first star means that the fees can change at any time. The second star indicates the following: A special international order or an international seminar is included in the tuition fees. If space is available, you can visit a second seminar, or run a second special order. This is a fee of $ 4,000 to be paid. The travel costs for all trial blocks, international seminars and international special orders are charged to the students.

It need hardly be mentioned that additional seminars and special orders "recommended" to the student as much experience can socialize in the "networks" to acquire. The required fees are astronomical for a course of five semesters or twenty months, absolutely. But if your company or you are willing even to grasp so deep into the pocket so you can participate in the courses of EMBA-Global, you may boast that among the "brightest and best"! have registered

See "Emba-Global Class of 2012" contains a list of companies, the employees for this course from which it is, it would lead to " friendships that were forged by intense transformational experience and a lifetime keep : Citigroup, Maersk, MTV, Ericsson, HSBC Bank, Morgan Stanley, BNP Paribas, Goodyear, Cisco, Google, Microsoft, Nomura Holdings, CBS, German Bank, Hoffman La Roche, World Bank, BASF, Merrill Lynch, Barclays Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, Credit Suisse.

the end of our introduction nor an essential point. Under " admission requirements " it says:
"For the time you spend away from the office will need the consent of your employer, to be admitted to this program. You need the signed letter from a legally authorized to show members of your company that shows that the latter allows you to spend the time necessary to complete the program away from the office. This legally authorized members of the company, it may be your supervisor, the President, the Executive Director or the Director of the Personnel Department

I ask for understanding that this introduction has been so long;. Is to understand the following knowledge the facts presented so far is essential. Only then can the significance of the fact that Mr. Krah anno 2012, a study at Emba Global intends to begin to appreciate fully. The - available on the Internet - List of Students revealed the name, nationality and professional status of each student, and the company for which he works. Here are the things for attentive observer of the Krah scandal are now tremendously exciting.

are as Mr Krah's "lawyer" to. Under these circumstances, he should name as the employer of course, the law firm where he works, namely:

Fetsch Lawyers: http://branchenbuch.meinestadt.de/dresden/company/6141439


Strangely, he mentioned this law firm are not. But perhaps his real breadwinner of the company Dello Sarto, where he has served as a manager?

Dello Sarto AG: http://www.moneyhouse.ch/u/dello_sarto_ag_CH-170.3.033.031-9.htm

Again No way! When his employer called Mr. Krah Maximilian in 2006 by the Society of St. Pius X. from the baptism of upscale, Jaidhof domiciled in Austria Private Foundation! How on earth can we make from this is a rhyme? have any reason to give it so, and the number of possible explanations is not very large. Could it be because it's law firm is economically not very good, or that they are next to giants like Citigroup, Credit Suisse and Microsoft seems too puny, particular for someone who wants to belong to the "brightest and best"? If so, why Krah cites as his employer for not the young company Della Sarto, where he works as a manager? Is this still a size too small and insignificant?

Perhaps we can solve the puzzle in more detail when we remind ourselves that one of the conditions for participation in the courses of EMBA-Global, "a successful professional career with several years experience in managing people, projects, budgets, and other resources ". To be included in the ranks of the "brightest and best," had the poor Maxi Demonstrate that he has a rich experience in the administration of "budget" (ie, large sums of money) had. Otherwise he would be in addition to the luminaries of the Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley and Co., for the like is a matter of course, so completely out of place was!

Who is the profile of the students look at who have registered for the Emba-Global's programs in 2012, one notices immediately that the Jaidhof Foundation acts like a foreign body, if it really is just a home-made company whose mission is is, the financial conditions for the survival and growth of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. to create. But filled as the Maxi its Internet registration form, he must have been sure that the company, which he cited the employer, would elicit his future fellow students by no means a sympathetic smile.

As we have seen, requires a participant in the courses of EMBA-Global for this purpose, the consent of his employer, he has the signed letter from a legally authorized members show his company, which proves that the latter allows him to to complete the program required to spend time outside his office. This can be signed under them it is the department head, the President, the executive director or the head of personnel department of the company act. This means in plain language that anyone has given in the top leadership of the Fraternity of Krah's green light to participate in the study program of EMBA-Global.

This undeniable - as corroborated by publicly available documents - that fact raises a number of issues: first

What leading figure of the Fraternity who signed the letter required by Krah?

second What was the reason for this?

third What concrete benefits promised to the Fraternity of the fact that it enabled a Zionist agent to participate in a wickedly expensive program, aimed at the pre-breeding of a global elite managers in the pay of the New World Order and in the service of Mammonkultes?

4th Krah has been paid for this course out of pocket, or did the Foundation for the costs?

5th If the former is true, his private foundation pays Jaidhof then during his absence, his salary rate movements?

is the most important question of all, however, as follows: What is this Jaidhof private foundation, and why Krah was so sure that these employers at Emba-Global would find acceptance? How were the bosses of EMBA-Global Maxi grant access to their illustrious company? If we can answer these questions satisfactorily, we will perhaps understand why a Zionist so much influence on the management of the finances of the Fraternity of St. Pius X. exercised and why the latter to propagate the spirit of Archbishop Lefebvre is increasingly untrue and merely a non-binding all mankind "traditionalism."


PS
the following text to Krah scandal has recently credo taken from an anonymous source, he cited this correctly, can be via a Google search . Demonstrate

Posted: 9 December 2010, 04:51 PM
Dello Sarto AG

key data from the company Dello Sarto
AG anniversary: 17-12-2008
beginning of its activities: 19-1-2009
members of the Board of Directors: http://www.moneyhouse. ch/u/dello_sarto_ag_CH-170.3.033.031-9.htm
Bernard Fellay
Emeric Baudot
Niklaus Pfluger
Maximilian Krah

Company Auditors: Grant Thornton 8-6-2010 to 19-1-2009
auditing, AG
8-6 -2010 to date: FIDARTIS Revisions AG

Interesting facts about FIDARTIS Revisions AG:
One of authorized members of the company is Mr Peter Josef Müller

Some interesting facts about Mr. Peter Josef Müller:
company director Laetitia AG since 29-5-2009
of the Board of Laetitia AG: Maximilian Krah (individual signatory) signatory
Laetitia AG: Maximilian Krah (individual signatory)

Peter Josef Müller sparked Peter Hochstrasser on 09.07.2010 the Board of Revisions AG FIDARTIS now and is a joint signatory. In addition, Dello Sarto AG FIDARTIS Revisions AG appointed as auditor in the previous month.

who even may be the anonymous source, I thank her for the fact that through diligent research NZU the roots of an issue pushed forward is that is steadily puzzling features. However, I want the reader's attention on some apparently trivial, but in reality to draw very important points: first

Both Müller and Krah met on 29 May 2009 on the Board of Laetitia AG, and both are individual signatories. In fact, the company that very day registered commercially.

second The company address is Laetitia AG: c / o Bader Law Firm, Grafenauweg 6, 6304, train, Switzerland. A number of other, not with the Priestly Fraternity of associated company also operates from that address and called the Bader Law Firm as a reference. Under these Also, it seems likely that it is the latter a mere shell company. Why give the person concerned will not equal the address of the company in Zurich, the more so, than all will be sent to the address in train post anyway redirected there?

third Interestingly, the true address of Dello Sarto, Krah, as mentioned in the works as manager, is completely consistent with that of Laetitia AG. Contacted one or Dello Sarto Laetitia AG http://www.moneyhouse.ch on the electronic address, then one also note that no telephone number, fax number, e-mail address or website is mentioned.

4th In other words, the commercial registration of the company Laetitia in Switzerland was only ten days before FIDARTIS Revisions AG Dello Sarto AG Zurm auditor were appointed, and Mueller met a month later the Board of FIDARTIS. That all associated paperwork could be completed within such a short time is unusual indeed!

Those interested in further Einzehlheiten the companies mentioned here, go to http://www.moneyhouse.ch

5th A Google search on "Bader Law Firm, Switzerland" brings nothing particularly interesting to the day, but you add the keywords "BADERTSCHER Lawyers AG (Zurich) "in the search engine google.com arises, one encounters the following address:
http://www.internationallawoffice.com/directory/detail.aspx?g=54fb281c-b6db-4ad3-ad47-4d5d5e739909

Who reads the information provided here fully realizes immediately that that Dello Sarto - and thus with the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. - Associated company is also pursuing "global interests" and "global networks" mitflicht.

BADERTSCHER Law Ltd. (Zurich)
* Address: Muhlenbach Road 32, PO Box 769, Zurich CH 8024
* Country: Switzerland
* Phone: 41 44 266 20 66
* Fax: 41 44 266 20 70
* E-mail: info@b-legal.ch
* Website: www.b-legal.ch
* Offices: train, Zurich
* Languages: English, French, German , Hebrew, Italian

workspaces
Administrative and Public Law, Antitrust, arbitration and mediation, banking, banking and finance, bankruptcy, capital markets, civil law, commercial law, corporate and commercial law, competition, construction, contracts, corporate law and data protection, e- Sale, employment, energy, environmental law, land planning, finances, health, information and communications, technology, information technology, law of succession; bankruptcy; Insurance, intellectual property rights, private international law, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, criminal procedures, retail, public law, taxation, technology law, telecommunications, transaction law.

company description

BADERTSCHER is a Swiss law firm with national and international reputation. Our lawyers are members of the Zurich and the Swiss Bar Association and various international rights groups.

Most of them have a high American or British university degree and / or work experience abroad. Our offices are located in Zurich.

BADERTSCHER is the future required to be sworn on quality and growth and are involved in rapid and important commercial and legal developments.

We advise on issues of private and public law, where we focus on commercial law.

Our customers are Swiss and foreign corporations, individuals and government organizations.

Like our customers, we too are themselves the focus of the events, one of our strengths is that we provide in new and complex legal issues expert advice.

your specialization and vouch for their quality and efficient, solution-oriented advice enable our lawyers, to keep pace with the impact of developments and our customers are, thanks to its expertise in interdisciplinary areas such as restructuring, privatization and cross-border transactions to the side.

Our attorneys attend a permanent professional development, including means for post-graduate programs.

Our lawyers contribute to the academic and legal and political developments by regularly publish the latest legal issues and participate in national and international associations, think tanks and seminars.

role of the global legal market

Our close cooperation with leading foreign Law firms, avoiding any exclusivity allows us to provide our customers with the best legal services, even for complex transactions between countries with different legal jurisdiction.

We also have solid contacts with experts from other disciplines than law. offer

The language skills of our lawyers enable us to offer our services in English, German, Italian, French and Hebrew.


One last note

That this company offers its services in Hebrew, is certainly worth mentioning. But more critical is the question: Who has the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. This law firm recommended and why? Is the Society for the preservation of their heritage and to obtain the - according to a recent Internet post by Father Laisney modest - amount of money it needs to expand its activities, because really need the help of such high-profile and expensive lawyers? Or maybe I missed something, and these lawyers of the Fraternity to sacrifice their time free of charge - perhaps because they are themselves in their faithful followers?



original " Krahgate revisited "